[GNUz] How does GLU/GNUz differ from CLUG?

[Rik Tindall]

Jim Cheetham wrote:
>> Timothy Musson wrote:

>> http://www.infohelp.co.nz/fsanz-constitution.html
> 
> You started numbering at 1, not 0 ... :-)

Och, those canny Oirish! Begorrah bejeezas..

How do we modify this to start the numbering gnuly?:

   <ol class="norm">
     <li> The freedom to run the program, for any purpose.</li>
     <li> ... </li>
   </ol>

(CSS noob, sniffing at research task, but likely to trim <li>s)

> Object 2 - should that be qualified or extended to refer to the
> definition of Free Software as framed by the FSF?

Done. And more..

> Your reference to Aotearoa NZ made me smile :-) Like the GNU in
> GNU/Linux, the Aotearoa in New Zealand is contestible. Like the GNU in
> GNU/Linux, is is also _understood_.

Hmmm.. a reference implied or essential? You're right :)

> The Constitution section I must admit I glossed over. If it's
> "boilerplate", it's probably appropriate. You need 3 officers, but
> it's not clear whether 1 person could fulfil all three roles at the
> same time or not. But I suspect the IRD may have clearer restrictions
> around that! They have a good set of data around clubs & societies
> IIRC, with the rules that you need in order to exempt yourself from
> their interest.

Seconded. It's secondary to being able to agree the title and Objects. 
So Draft-1 emerges with the Constitution section suspended, until we've 
found a group willing to tackle it.

Cheers
-- 
Rik