[mythtvnz] anyone recommend the Phillips 32" LCD Widescreen flat TV?

Steve Hodge mythtvnz@lists.linuxnut.co.nz
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:25:16 +1300


------=_Part_25668_32524065.1169000716177
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 1/17/07, Jason Haar <jhaar-ourshack-com@whanau.org> wrote:
>
> Currently my wife has her eye on the Phillips 32" LCD Widescreen
> (32PF7321: see http://tinyurl.com/yqzyx2) and from what I can see it
> looks pretty good.


My opinion is that you are best off either buying the cheapest acceptable
quality TV you can or buying something likely to be future-proof (i.e. 1080p
native resolution). In my case I went for the cheap plasma - a 42" Hyundai
about a year ago. I'm very happy with it. Burn-in is not the bugbear people
make it out to be, even with a relatively low quality set.

One factor to consider is the size of your current set. A 32" widescreen TV
shows a 4:3 picture at the same size as a 26" 4:3 TV. So if your existing TV
is 26" or bigger you might want to consider a larger TV unless you plan to
stretch 4:3 content horizontally (which, incidentally, I do). With a 29" 4:3
TV the difference is significant: a 32" widescreen TV displaying a 4:3
picture has only 80% of the area. So I'd definitely consider a 42" unless
your room is very small - you won't regret the extra size.

Steve

------=_Part_25668_32524065.1169000716177
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 1/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jason Haar</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:jhaar-ourshack-com@whanau.org">jhaar-ourshack-com@whanau.org</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Currently my wife has her eye on the Phillips 32&quot; LCD Widescreen<br>(32PF7321: see <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yqzyx2">http://tinyurl.com/yqzyx2</a>) and from what I can see it<br>looks pretty good.</blockquote><div>
<br></div></div>My opinion is that you are best off either buying the cheapest acceptable quality TV you can or buying something likely to be future-proof (i.e. 1080p native resolution). In my case I went for the cheap plasma - a 42&quot; Hyundai about a year ago. I&#39;m very happy with it. Burn-in is not the bugbear people make it out to be, even with a relatively low quality set.
<br><br>One factor to consider is the size of your current set. A 32&quot; widescreen TV shows a 4:3 picture at the same size as a 26&quot; 4:3 TV. So if your existing TV is 26&quot; or bigger you might want to consider a larger TV unless you plan to stretch 4:3 content horizontally (which, incidentally, I do). With a 29&quot; 4:3 TV the difference is significant: a 32&quot; widescreen TV displaying a 4:3 picture has only 80% of the area. So I&#39;d definitely consider a 42&quot; unless your room is very small - you won&#39;t regret the extra size.
<br><br>Steve<br><br>

------=_Part_25668_32524065.1169000716177--