[GNUz] people giving the GPL a bad name

[Nick Rout]

Sorry, other end of stick :)

I was thinking that those posing difficult to live with results give the
GPL a bad name.


On Mon, May 22, 2006 5:20 pm, Jim Cheetham wrote:
> It doesn't give the GPL a bad name, it's reassuring to see edge cases
> being discussed.
>
> Do lawyers arguing with each other in court give law a bad name?
>
> Ummmm ...
>
> :-)
>
> -jim
>
> On May 22, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Nick Rout wrote:
>
>> http://kororaa.org/comments.php?y=3D06&m=3D05&entry=3Dentry060512-1607=
52
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D06/05/14/2059242&from=3Drss
>>
>> Theres a lot of debate there about whether the distribution of compile=
d
>> nVidia and ATI link code is a breach of the GPL.
>>
>> Frankly it doesn't so much matter which is right, what matters is that
>> this goves GPL a bad name.
>>
>> Discuss on one side of A4 :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nick Rout <nick@rout.co.nz>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GNUz mailing list
>> GNUz@inode.co.nz
>> http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/gnuz
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUz mailing list
> GNUz@inode.co.nz
> http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/gnuz
>