[DISIG-cabal] Confidentiality/sharing guidelines

[Brendan Murray]

Actually, I was saying that from memory. COC is useless "play nice".

Attendees should be a public thing, but if someone asks "no photos" or
similar, then respect that.
Other than that, it's a public meeting. So if a presenter wishes Chatham
House, or "no pictures, no reports, this might be illegal/embarrassing"
then it's honoured.


On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:04 AM Brendan Murray <xasperated at gmail.com> wrote:

> Default is coc, individuals can elect looser or tighter if presenting, but
> can't loosen for others
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, 20:17 Jim Cheetham via Dunedin-ISIG-cabal, <
> dunedin-isig-cabal at lists.ourshack.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd forgotten about the existing CoC, thanks. That's a start :-) and
>> covers off Wheaton's Law.
>>
>> And perhaps Chatham House Rules are a bit too strict ...
>>
>> But I wanted something that said, as a general rule, we can disclose
>> within ISIG but don't expect it to spread further ...
>>
>> --
>>   Jim Cheetham
>>   jim at cheetham.nz
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, at 7:02 PM, Chris Burgess wrote:
>>
>> I think it should be a general rule but as licenses are to projects,
>> perhaps we allow speakers to designate terms of their talks or make sure
>> this rule is available to attendees.
>>
>> I have no issue with Chatham House Rule ... but maybe some speakers would
>> choose otherwise?
>>
>> And while we'd also frown on, say, sharing a list of bluetooth device IDs
>> at a local ISIG (!!!), would we want to enforce a rule that says we can't
>> talk about who came?
>>
>> ISIG has a CoC also: https://isig.org.nz/ISIG.code.of.conduct.pdf which
>> will apply to our group (I presume?).
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 13:21, Jim Cheetham via Dunedin-ISIG-cabal <
>> dunedin-isig-cabal at lists.ourshack.com> wrote:
>>
>> Shall we declare ISIG meetings under the Chatham House Rule?
>>
>> "When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule,
>> participants are free to use the information received, but neither the
>> identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other
>> participant, may be revealed."
>> https://www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule
>>
>> And perhaps also invoke FriendDA?
>> "WHEREAS I possess a bright idea that I am choosing to disclose to you,
>> The Advisor, with the mutual understanding that you are my friend and that
>> you will not screw me ..."
>> http://www.friendda.org/
>>
>> And also Wheaton's Law?
>> "Don't be a dick"
>> --
>>   Jim Cheetham
>>   jim at cheetham.nz
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dunedin-ISIG-cabal mailing list
>> Dunedin-ISIG-cabal at lists.ourshack.com
>> https://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/dunedin-isig-cabal
>> All messages are publicly archived
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dunedin-ISIG-cabal mailing list
>> Dunedin-ISIG-cabal at lists.ourshack.com
>> https://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/dunedin-isig-cabal
>> All messages are publicly archived
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/dunedin-isig-cabal/attachments/20190305/4d8535c3/attachment.html>