[chbot] USB2 vs USB3 ports
cdhmanning at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 19:16:11 GMT 2016
Perhaps I didn't explain properly... I meant the other way around:
plugging a development board (eg. CHIP/ RPi/whatever) into a PC for
software flashing etc. The dev board is a device.
"If you are using a computer with USB3 ports, it’s suggested that you
attach a USB2-compliant hub and connect your CHIP to the hub, instead of
directly to the USB3 port."
I was under the impression that USB3 is a superset of USB2 allowing ALL
USB2 devices to work in USB3 slots.
Statements like those above suggest otherwise...
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Mark Atherton <markaren1 at xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> Depends on the question you ask :)
> The real answer may be that USB2 is almost ubiquitous in PC (and MAC)
> land, whereas USB3 is relatively new. Companies supplying dev-kits may be
> able to provide cheaper hardware, to a wider audience with USB2, unless
> there is a compelling reason that USB3 is required.
> Presumably USB3 will take over from USB2 in the fullness of time, but we
> are also at an interesting point in history where mobile devices are
> starting (?) to dominate the computing market. Not sure how a mobile device
> might implement USB3 OTG WRT to the increased power delivery requirement(?)
> of 5V/900mA.
> Anyway, just a thought...
> On 8/12/2016 7:32 AM, Charles Manning wrote:
>> I quite often see instructions for things like development boards to use
>> themwith USB2 port and not USB3 ports.
>> Asked Uncle Google a few times, but I have yet to see a good reason why.
>> Anyone know?
> Chchrobotics mailing list Chchrobotics at lists.linuxnut.co.nz
> Mail Archives: http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/chchrobotics/
> Meetings usually 3rd Monday each month. See http://kiwibots.org for
> venue, directions and dates.
> When replying, please edit your Subject line to reflect new subjects.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chchrobotics