<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Brett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mythicalbeast@slingshot.co.nz">mythicalbeast@slingshot.co.nz</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">> ><br>
> > What's the problem there?<br>
> ><br>
> Ditto that question. I have a Pana plasma full HD and have it set to<br>
> overscan to avoid showing permanently lit top left pixel on TV1/2.<br>
> Doesn't seem to have any impact on picture quality. Only hassle is if<br>
> content uses full height or width which means pic can be clipped a<br>
> little. Usually no biggie.<br>
<br>
</div>Overscan uses the TV internal scaler. Driving a DFP at any resolution<br>
other than native will cause picture quality degradation. This does<br>
require the DFP to support pixel mapping, some do not.<br>
<br>
Having recently used the latest model Pana V20 for a week..<br>
The default Pana plasma setup is for shop showroom.<br>
<br>
I did not find any bright pixels or lines (pre 1080i ONE & 2).<br>
IMO the Pana just-scan pixel mapping is the best setup for pic quality.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>fine if your tv has that setting<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">IMO the TV internal scaler is inferior to nvidia feature set C GT 240.<br>
<br>
Can not comment on de-interlacing performance as did not use internal<br>
freeview or any interlaced video signals. I could not see anything wrong<br>
with the de-interlacing from the video card.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br><br></div></div>