<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, steve <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steve@greengecko.co.nz">steve@greengecko.co.nz</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
If you really do expect to be dynamically changing file system sizes in<br>
the future, then I'd go reiserfs. Personally, I doubt that this is going<br>
to happen, so I'd stick with good old ext3, unless you're going to have<br>
thousands of files in a small number of directories... unlikely with a<br>
myth box!</blockquote><div><br>Why? Both xfs and jfs support extending filesystems and both of them are generally considered to be more suitable for large files than reiserfs. Neither of them suffer from the slow delete issue that ext3 has either (though that has been worked around in Myth).<br>
<br>Cheers,<br>Steve <br></div></div>