Rik Tindall wrote: > Can we say 'implemented_kernel_design+license' = an 'o/s type' perhaps? > > Which gives us Hurds, - that should say Machs - > *BSDs, one LINUX® (a real strength in that unity), MSDOS.SYS (or is it > IO.SYS?), and others irrelevant to 99.9% of Users (unless I've omitted > something important, like Amiga?.).