[DISIG-cabal] Confidentiality/sharing guidelines

[Chris Burgess]

I think it should be a general rule but as licenses are to projects,
perhaps we allow speakers to designate terms of their talks or make sure
this rule is available to attendees.

I have no issue with Chatham House Rule ... but maybe some speakers would
choose otherwise?

And while we'd also frown on, say, sharing a list of bluetooth device IDs
at a local ISIG (!!!), would we want to enforce a rule that says we can't
talk about who came?

ISIG has a CoC also: https://isig.org.nz/ISIG.code.of.conduct.pdf which
will apply to our group (I presume?).

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 13:21, Jim Cheetham via Dunedin-ISIG-cabal <
dunedin-isig-cabal at lists.ourshack.com> wrote:

> Shall we declare ISIG meetings under the Chatham House Rule?
>
> "When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule,
> participants are free to use the information received, but neither the
> identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other
> participant, may be revealed."
> https://www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule
>
> And perhaps also invoke FriendDA?
> "WHEREAS I possess a bright idea that I am choosing to disclose to you,
> The Advisor, with the mutual understanding that you are my friend and that
> you will not screw me ..."
> http://www.friendda.org/
>
> And also Wheaton's Law?
> "Don't be a dick"
> --
>   Jim Cheetham
>   jim at cheetham.nz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dunedin-ISIG-cabal mailing list
> Dunedin-ISIG-cabal at lists.ourshack.com
> https://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/dunedin-isig-cabal
> All messages are publicly archived
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/dunedin-isig-cabal/attachments/20190304/ab73cf03/attachment.html>