[onerng talk] Another source of seed data ...
Peter Gutmann
pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz
Thu Feb 25 11:51:59 GMT 2016
Paul Campbell <paul at taniwha.com>writes:
>but yes it is a bit of a gimmick - but it does assume that nation-states
>can't game the results of their national lotteries ....
The concept is similar to the one used for the numbers racket in the 1920s and
1930s, you use as your random seed the results of an unpredictable number that
was published the following day. Otto "Abba Dabba" Berman figured out how to
fix this, making a small fortune for his boss Dutch Schultz.
Peter.
OneRNG
Another
source of seed data ...
by
Paul
Campbell
in
OneRNG
Talk
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:04:47 Peter Gutmann wrote:
> This is for a publicly-verifiable source of randomness rather than a secure
> PRNG, and it's mostly a clever-gimmick idea (as are many others of this
> form). An easier-to-work-with one would be to use a fixed historical
> document (your favourite bit of Shakespeare, the Gettysburg address,
> something ascribed to Confucius, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
> cthulhu fhtagn, whatever) to seed a PRNG.
I think the important difference here is that you can't pick and choose a seed
that suits you (maybe Othello happens to make a particularly trivial curve) -
instead you nominate ahead of time a bunch of verifiable lotteries before they
happen, seal your choices a bunch of ways with a verifiable timestamp (like in
the blockchain), wait for the draws then use them - this way you don't know
the actual numbers before you choose their sources and can't game the result
by choosing ones that suit you
but yes it is a bit of a gimmick - but it does assume that nation-states can't
game the results of their national lotteries ....
Paul
⮪
Reply
🖂 New topic
View topic…
Unsubscribe
•
Switch to a daily digest
Privacy
Acceptable
Use
Terms
of Service
More information about the Discuss
mailing list