<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">If they had simply said, sorry this is
      a fake FTDI and refused to work, I would agree with you.<br>
      <br>
      But they don’t. They deliberately go out of their way to 'break'
      the fake FTDI chip, no warning or anything. <br>
      <br>
      This is malicious and probably illegal, wilful property damage
      comes to mind..  <br>
      <br>
      The main issus is that 95% of consumers have no idea there was
      even fake chips, let alone that they had one. And it;s the
      customer this is punishing. The seller of the chips doesn’t care,
      they already have the money from the consumer.<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 27/10/14 15:35, Charles Manning wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAE21AQoQ6S0HB4KDT4L-=rsPVKYDUXjvUcOagQrbsPKeU8wJnw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>I cannot see how either MS or FTDI are to blame or can be
            seen to be illegal.<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          That driver works fine with a legitimate product.<br>
          <br>
          Someone has chosen to build a product which pretends to be an
          FTDI chip, but is not. They're not paying for all FTDI's
          software engineering etc (as good or rubbish as they might
          be). They're just trying to mimic the FTDI to encourage people
          to use software in a way that does not conform to the
          licensing policy.<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        USB.org issues VIDs specifically so that software can identify
        the product it is working with. If you produce a product that
        hi-jacks some elses VID and that driver does not work, or even
        breaks, your device then it is YOUR fault.<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Mark
          Beckett <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:m.beckett@amuri.net" target="_blank">m.beckett@amuri.net</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I've been
            getting emails from my overseas contacts for the few days.<br>
            <br>
            This is some other info regarding what was a deliberate and
            possibly illegal move by FTDI.<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/ftdi-driver-kills-fake-ftdi-ft232/msg535270/#msg535270"
              target="_blank">http://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/ftdi-driver-kills-fake-ftdi-ft232/msg535270/#msg535270</a><br>
            <br>
               I did find this one which shows the internals of both
            genuine and<br>
               non-genuine which is interesting.<br>
               <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://zeptobars.ru/en/read/FTDI-FT232RL-real-vs-fake-supereal"
              target="_blank">http://zeptobars.ru/en/read/FTDI-FT232RL-real-vs-fake-supereal</a><br>
                       My view is FTDI have overstepped the mark by
            making them non<br>
               functional, regardless of the copyright/you're using our
            driver.<br>
               The end-user probably has no idea of what is inside the
            device they<br>
               just brought.<br>
                   FTDI should have detected the device as not genuine
            and refused to<br>
               load the driver for it.<br>
               The customer would then have returned the product to the
            supplier,<br>
               and the corrective action could then take place.<br>
                   This 'fix' has probably signed the end for FTDI,
            given that other<br>
               products that are available, and that their product is
            not cheap to<br>
               start with.<br>
               MS are equally to blame since they have deployed a driver
            that<br>
               knowing renders devices useless that were working and are
            not theirs<br>
               to mess with.<br>
               By changing the device, it no longer works on other OS's,
            which is<br>
               well beyond their software agreements no matter how you
            read their EULA.<br>
               Hopefully someone decides to sue them, maybe someone who
            already<br>
               dislikes them and has big pockets ....<br>
                   In a twist of irony, it seems the FTDI software
            (FT_prog) will<br>
               happily talk to the non-genuine device to write the
            VID/PID, and I<br>
               have a copy of the older version if anyone gets trapped.<br>
            <br>
            While Volker may think he's quite safe using Linux, the
            issue is if the device was connected to a windows box with
            the new drivers, it won't work on his linux box now, since
            the PID has been set to zero.<br>
            <br>
            I have some sympathy for FTDI, but using Microsoft to
            deliberately reset the PID has gone too far, it should have
            simply refused to talk to the device.<br>
            And if you read some of the various blogs, it was FTDI that
            pulled it, most likely because of the backlash/fallout that
            was coming.<br>
            <br>
            It shouldn't affect any Arduino UNO or true clone as they
            use an Atmel 8U2 or 16U2 to interface to the USB.<br>
            Since there are some who suggest not to use 'cheap chinese
            knock-offs' they won't have to worry either.... :-)<span
              class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
                <br>
                Mark</font></span>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5"><br>
                <br>
                <br>
                Mark Atherton wrote:<br>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  Another gem from Julian.<br>
                  <br>
                  ... and there could be quite some fallout with the
                  Arduino community.<br>
                  <br>
                  I am still dwelling on the consequences of FTDI's
                  actions.<br>
                  <br>
                  -mark<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    Subject: Heard about the FTDI caper?<br>
                    To: Mark Atherton <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:markaren1@xtra.co.nz" target="_blank">markaren1@xtra.co.nz</a>><br>
                    <br>
                    <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://brainwagon.org/2014/10/24/ftdi-gate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+brainwagon+%28brainwagon%29"
                      target="_blank">http://brainwagon.org/2014/10/24/ftdi-gate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+brainwagon+%28brainwagon%29</a>><a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://brainwagon.org/2014/10/24/ftdi-gate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+brainwagon+%28brainwagon%29"
                      target="_blank">http://brainwagon.org/2014/10/24/ftdi-gate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+brainwagon+%28brainwagon%29</a>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    Hi Mark<br>
                    <br>
                    Just read about this...J<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  Chchrobotics mailing list <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:Chchrobotics@lists.linuxnut.co.nz"
                    target="_blank">Chchrobotics@lists.linuxnut.co.nz</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/chchrobotics"
                    target="_blank">http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/chchrobotics</a><br>
                  Mail Archives: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/chchrobotics/"
                    target="_blank">http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/chchrobotics/</a><br>
                  Web site: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://kiwibots.org" target="_blank">http://kiwibots.org</a><br>
                  Meetings 3rd Monday each month.<br>
                  <br>
                  When replying, please edit your Subject line to
                  reflect new content.<br>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                Chchrobotics mailing list <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Chchrobotics@lists.linuxnut.co.nz"
                  target="_blank">Chchrobotics@lists.linuxnut.co.nz</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/chchrobotics"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/chchrobotics</a><br>
                Mail Archives: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/chchrobotics/"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/chchrobotics/</a><br>
                Web site: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://kiwibots.org" target="_blank">http://kiwibots.org</a><br>
                Meetings 3rd Monday each month.<br>
                <br>
                When replying, please edit your Subject line to reflect
                new content.<br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Chchrobotics mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Chchrobotics@lists.linuxnut.co.nz">Chchrobotics@lists.linuxnut.co.nz</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/chchrobotics">http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/chchrobotics</a>
Mail Archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/chchrobotics/">http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/chchrobotics/</a>
Web site: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://kiwibots.org">http://kiwibots.org</a>
Meetings 3rd Monday each month.

When replying, please edit your Subject line to reflect new content.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>